Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00654
Original file (BC 2014 00654.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF: 	DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00654

			COUNSEL:  NONE

			HEARING DESIRED:  NO 



APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

Her date of rank (DOR) to the grade of first lieutenant (O-2) be changed from 5 Jan 10 to 31 Dec 09.


APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

She graduated from Phase II of the Interservice Physician Assistant Program (IPAP) on 30 Dec 09 and signed her oath of office on 31 Dec 09.  The Military Personnel Flight (MPF) was closed 31 Dec 09 through 3 Jan 10 due to holidays and weekend.  This combination of circumstances resulted in her first lieutenant DOR being 5 Jan 10.  Six of her classmates that graduated from other Phase II locations were able to have their DOR set as 31 Dec 09 and were on the captain selection board results.  A similarly situated classmate that graduated at her location had his first lieutenant DOR changed by the AFBCMR to 31 Dec 09.  As the major’s promotion board runs from January to December, her current DOR will place her one year behind her classmates to be eligible for promotion, even though they started school the same day, were all in the same program, and all had the same official graduation date.  

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.


STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant initially entered the Regular Air Force on 7 Jan 98.  

On 31 Dec 09, the applicant was commissioned a first lieutenant in the Air Force Reserves.

On 4 Jan 10, the applicant was separated from the Regular Air Force in the grade of technical sergeant (E-6).  

On 5 Jan 10, the applicant entered into extended active duty (EAD) as a first lieutenant (O-2).

The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandums prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR), which are attached at Exhibits C and D.   


AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPAN defers to AFPC Service Dates Verification Office to address/validate the applicant’s first lieutenant DOR, but does provide information pertaining the applicant’s appointment in the grade of first lieutenant.  In Dec 09, the applicant was commissioned as a reserve first lieutenant in the Biomedical Sciences Corps and entered active duty in Jan 10.  Medical officers are commissioned in the reserves of the Air Force under AFI 36-2005, Appointment in Commissioned Grades and Designation and Assignment in Professional Categories – Reserve of the Air Force and United States Air Force, then accessed to active duty under AFI 36-2008, Voluntary Extended Active Duty (EAD) for Air Reserve Commissioned Officers.  In Jan 10, the applicant’s CSC was computed and the amount awarded to her was two years and two days, resulting in her being appointed in the grade of first lieutenant.  

A complete copy of the AFPC/DPAN evaluation is at Exhibit C.

AFPC/DPSIPV recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice.  The applicant’s current DOR, 3 Jan 10, was established in accordance with AFI 36-2008.  She was commissioned as a reserve officer in the Biomedical Sciences Corps on 31 Dec 09 and entered EAD on 5 Jan 10.  In accordance with AFI 36-2008, she received 50 percent credit from 31 Dec 09 to 4 Jan 10 (day prior to her EAD) for a total of two days, establishing her DOR as 3 Jan 10, with her EAD of 5 Jan 10 as the first day of travel as documented on her Master Military Pay Account (MMPA) file.  

A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIPV evaluation is at Exhibit D.


APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 18 Aug 14 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D).  As of this date, no response has been received by this office.


THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations.
2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice.  While we note the comments of AFPC/DPSIPV indicating that relief should be denied because the applicant’s date of rank was appropriately established in compliance with Air Force Instruction 36-2008, we also note that a Mar 2008 SAF/GCI opinion stated that the AFBCMR has authority to adjust the date of rank of an officer if, due to unusual circumstances, the appointment is delayed from the date on which it would otherwise have been made.  More recently, a 10 Feb 2015 memorandum from the Undersecretary of Defense (Personnel and Readiness) flatly stated that the AFBCMR “may also adjust the date of rank of an officer who has been properly appointed” as was the case with this applicant.  Of course the Board’s authority to correct a date of rank is limited to those cases demonstrating error or injustice.  We believe the circumstances here constitute an injustice.  As the applicant indicates, because her 30 Dec 09 graduation from IPAP and 31 Dec 09 oath of office/commissioning took place when the local military personnel flight (MPF) was closed for the holiday season, her separation date and subsequent order to extended active duty was delayed due to no fault of her own.  Moreover, while the delay constitutes an injustice based on the facts presented alone, the Board noted that others similarly situated either had their date of rank set upon signing their oaths of office 31 Dec 09, or were successful in getting the Board to correct their records showing their date of rank as 31 Dec 09.  Therefore, we recommend the applicant’s records be corrected as indicated below.


THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the APPLICANT be corrected to show a date of rank (DOR) in the grade of first lieutenant (O-2) of 31 December 2009 rather than 3 January 2010.  


The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2014-00654 in Executive Session on 27 Jan 15 under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:



All members voted to correct the records as recommended.  The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2014-00654 was considered:

	Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 22 Jan 14, w/atchs.
	Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
	Exhibit C.  Memorandum, AFPC/DPAN, dated 9 Jun 14, w/atchs.
	Exhibit D.  Memorandum, AFPC/DPSIPV, dated 17 Jul 14, 
	            w/atchs.
	Exhibit E.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 18 Aug 14.

				

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01694

    Original file (BC-2011-01694.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Six of his classmates that graduated from other locations had their DORs as 31 December 2009 and were recently on the captain selection board. ________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant was appointed into the Air Force Reserves on 31 December 2009 and entered into extended active duty (EAD) on 5 January 2010. He received 50 percent credit from 31 December 2009 to 4 January 2010 for a total of 2 days which established his date of rank...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00409

    Original file (BC 2014 00409.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00409 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her date of rank (DOR) to the grade of captain (O-3) be changed from 14 Jan 14 to 30 May 13. Under Reserve Appointment Order D-0719, dated 7 Aug 13, the applicant was appointed to the grade of captain with a date of appointment of 30 May 13, based upon the constructive service credit (CSC) she was awarded at that...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01441

    Original file (BC-2012-01441.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Upon reentering the military in the BSC, she was initially awarded two full years of credit without specifying which dates were the dates for which she received the educational credit. Per USC Title 10, “A period of time shall be counted only once when computing constructive service credit.” To prevent awarding service credit for the same period of time for her commissioned military service time and time spent earning her MPH degree, DPAFM2 must subtract her two years of educational credit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03244

    Original file (BC-2011-03244.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03244 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her original date of rank (DOR) to second lieutenant (2Lt) (O-1) be changed to 14 February 2003. The error in her DOR occurred due to her EAD date being recorded as 28 February 2003 rather than 1 March 2003 causing her original DOR to be 16 February...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01434

    Original file (BC 2014 01434.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01434 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her entry/commissioning grade be changed to Captain (Capt/O-3) rather than First Lieutenant (1Lt/02). AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFRS/RSO recommends approval for the Air Force to issue back pay and rank credit to the grade of captain. THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1998 | 9800042

    Original file (9800042.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-00042 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REOUESTS THAT: A waiver of the six-month extended active duty eligibility requirement be approved in order for him to be considered for promotion to the grade of major by the CY98B Major Biomedical Sciences Corps (BSC) Central Selection Board, which convened on 6 April 1998. DPPPO stated that although the applicant requests a waiver...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05070

    Original file (BC 2013 05070.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAN recommends denial of the applicant’s request for an additional five to six months of constructive service credit (CSC) for her professional experiences prior to entering active duty or receiving a commission. Notwithstanding the recommendation to deny the applicant’s...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01332

    Original file (BC-2005-01332.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Upon his reentry to active duty on 10 July 2004, he was not given constructive service credit for his MPAS. DPAMF2 states the applicant did have a break in service, but his Master of Physician Assistant Studies (MPAS) was not factored upon reentry since he earned this degree while on active duty as a Biomedical Sciences Corps (BSC) Medical Officer. His constructive credit was “l/2 time” of four years...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05379

    Original file (BC 2013 05379.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-5379 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect he was appointed in the grade of lieutenant colonel (O-5), instead of major (O-4), effective 5 Nov 13, the date the Senate confirmed his appointment as a lieutenant colonel in the Air Force. The Air Force Recruiting Service (AFRS) negotiated his commission/entry to active duty...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2000 | 9801533

    Original file (9801533.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    However, the Air Force would only grant half-time for work experience and, because the NCA and ASCP were the only certifying agencies accepted by the Air Force, would only credit her work experience from Aug 93 when she received her certification from the ASCP. The applicant was advised of the CSC computation error and the change in grade and pay. Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant, dated 12 Sep 99, w/atchs CHARLENE M. BRADLEY Panel Chair AFBCMR 98-01533 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having...